Books-Andrew Jackson

BOOKS: I’m reading “Andrew Jackson” by SeanWilentz (part of the American Presidents series). I was particularly struck by Wilentz’ prologue in which he attempts to categorize Jackson in terms of Liberal versus Conservative—only to find that it cannot be done with today’s redefinition of Liberal versus Conservative. Wilentz says “The idea, for example, that there has always been a pro-big government party and a laissez-faire party, and that presidents can be judged by which they adhere to, is as useless in interpreting the politics of the 1830’s as it is for interpreting our own time. American political parties have always blended “small government” and “big government” policies. Today, the Republican Party rejects federal regulation of business, but shows a robust willingness to regulate individuals over certain social, cultural, and political issues. Without embarrassment, Republican leaders look to the federal courts sometimes at the direct expense of state rights to secure what they consider a favorable outcome. The Democratic Party, meanwhile, is much more attentive to regulating business, but comparatively laissez faire on cultural and social matters –and, when it suits them, Democrats kick and scream about violations of state rights.” The same dynamic was going on in Jackson’s days. This writing especially resonated with me as I read about the political machinations of the FDA. We have not had a head of the FDA for the last three years because of the ideological tug and pull between Conservative Republicans who want to eliminate birth control pills and Liberal Democrats who don’t. Talk about dynamic role reversal—Republicans trying to regulate the market and Democrats advocating letting the market work. This certainly seems to be a role reversal.

I’m really enjoying learning about Jackson and would recommend the book. He is definitely somebody who would not appeal to me. But that was a different time!